A major controversy has erupted at the AI Impact Summit Expo held at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi, after Galgotias University showcased a robotic dog that sparked widespread criticism online.
Viral Video Triggers Row
The issue began when a video from the summit went viral, showing a university professor introducing a robotic dog named “Orion.” The professor claimed the machine was developed by Galgotias University’s Centre of Excellence and could be used for surveillance and monitoring across the campus.
Tech Community Calls Out the Claim
Soon after the clip gained traction, technology experts and observers identified the robot as the Unitree Go2, a commercially available quadruped robot manufactured by Chinese robotics company Unitree.
Watch For Haryanvi by Haryanvi Podcast Series on YouTube.
Social media users accused the university of presenting imported technology as an in-house innovation, intensifying the backlash.
Reports of Stall Being Vacated
According to government sources, authorities reportedly asked Galgotias University to vacate its stall at the expo following the controversy.
Media reports also suggested that the robotic dog was removed from display amid growing criticism over transparency.
The incident has drawn political reactions and raised serious questions about how innovation is showcased at high-profile technology events.
University Responds: ‘Miscommunication’ Behind Controversy
Galgotias University denied receiving any official order to vacate. In a statement, the institution said the robotic dog was part of student learning and programming initiatives, where global technologies are used to provide real-world AI exposure.
The university also expressed concern over what it called a “propaganda campaign,” warning that such negativity could harm student morale.
A Bigger Debate on Ethics and Innovation
The robodog row has sparked a broader conversation around:
- Transparency in academic research
- Ethical technology demonstrations
- India’s push for indigenous AI development
Experts say using imported hardware is not wrong — but institutions must clearly disclose origins while highlighting their own software or research contributions.
Discover more from Peddler Media
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Advertisement © Peddler Media
You must be logged in to post a comment.